Zaɓin wipes masu ruwa don kiyayewa - Kwatanta hanyoyin kimantawa na ingancin kiyayewa don kayayyakin wipes masu ruwa (USP<51> & PCPC M-5)

Saboda ɗaukar su da sauƙin amfani, wipes masu ruwa sun zama samfurin tsabtace-tsabtace mai mahimmanci a rayuwar yau da kullun na masu amfani da yawa. Koyaya, abin da mutane da yawa ba su sani ba shine cewa idan aka kwatanta da sauran kayan kula da mutum, wipes masu ruwa suna da sauƙin gurɓataccen ƙwayoyin cuta.

The reason is that although the basic composition of wet wipes is only a combination of non-woven fabrics and a certain amount of wet wipes ruwa (i.e., functional liquid), and the liquid formula is mainly water and a small amount of nutrients, this high-moisture, trace-nutrient-rich environment is very easy to breed bacteria and molds - whether in production, storage or consumer use.

Saboda haka, don tabbatar da ingancin ƙwayoyin cuta da aminci na kayayyakin wipes masu ruwa, masana'antun suna buƙatar kulawa na musamman ga zaɓin tsarin kiyayewa da ƙayyade adadin kayan kiyayewa da aka ƙara yayin matakin ƙirar tsari. Yawancin lokaci ana kimanta ingancin tsarin kiyayewa ta hanyar gwajin kimantawa na ingancin kiyayewa na duniya (PET), wanda aka sani da gwajin kalubalen kiyayewa.

A halin yanzu, kayayyakin wipes na gida galibi suna nufin hanyoyi biyu masu zuwa lokacin gudanar da gwaje-gwajen aikin rigakafi:

1. Amurka Pharmacopoeia USP<51>: Gwajin Ingancin Antimicrobial

This method uses **extruded liquid (i.e. wet wipes ruwa)** in finished wet wipes as the test sample for challenge test. The advantages are simple operation, good repeatability, and high detection efficiency. It is suitable for wet wipes products with low adsorption of non-woven fabrics to antiseptic active ingredients. Since most of the antiseptic active ingredients are retained in the extruded liquid, the test results can better reflect the actual antiseptic ability of the entire wet wipes product.

2. PCPC (a baya CTFA) M-5: Hanyar gwajin kwayar cuta ta musamman don kayan da ba a saka su ba

Kwamitin Kayan Kula da Mutum na Amurka ne ya haɓaka wannan hanyar. A cikin gwajin, ana amfani da ruwan ƙwayoyin cuta kai tsaye a cikin kusurwa huɗu da tsakiyar samfurin wipes mai ruwa (hanyar maki biyar) don lura da ci gaban ƙwayoyin cuta a kan matrix na masana'antar da ba a saka ba. Tun da wannan hanyar kai tsaye tana kimanta ainihin aikin tsarin kashe cuta a cikin mai ɗaukar wipes mai ruwa, ya fi kusa da ainihin yanayin amfani da samfurin.

Koyaya, idan aka kwatanta da USP<51>, hanyar M-5 ta fi rikitarwa don aiki kuma tana da tsawon zagaye na gwaji, don haka ingantawa a cikin gwajin ainihi yana da iyaka. Koyaya, don kayayyakin wipes masu danshi waɗanda nonwovens suna da ƙarfin adsorption zuwa kayan kiyayewa, idan kawai an gwada ruwan da aka fitar, ana iya ƙarancin tasirin kashe cuta. A wannan lokacin, hanyar M-5 na iya kimanta aikin rigakafi na samfurin sosai.

3. Wanene hanyar da ta fi dacewa don gwajin aikin riga na riga?

A gaskiya, hanyoyin biyu suna da nasu mai da hankali:

If the preservative in the wet wipes ruwa in the wet wipes product is not easily adsorbed by the carrier, the USP<51> is more convenient and efficient, and is suitable for daily rapid screening;

Idan akwai tasirin adsorption mai ƙarfi tsakanin mai kiyayewa da non-woven, zai iya haifar da ƙananan haɗin haɗin aiki a cikin ruwan da aka fitar. A wannan lokacin, hanyar M-5 na iya nuna ainihin ingancin tsarin rigakafi a cikin samfurin ƙarshe.

Ƙarshe

In summary, both USP<51> and PCPC M-5 are currently widely recognized and recommended wet wipes ruwa antiseptic performance evaluation methods. Each manufacturer and third-party laboratory can choose the most appropriate testing method based on the specific formula characteristics and usage scenarios of the wet wipes products to ensure the microbial safety and stability of the products throughout their life cycle.